If that's what they're asking we should pay it. For the elite skillset and scoring he would provide to this team he's worth something like Horvat + Corrado + Higgins (to use your example).
- AlexF

I still think they'd want more than that to be honest and would likely receive better offers from other teams.

This is why i put markstrom and a prospect(likely shink) as gives EDM a goalie with higher projection than what they have now(could probably already do better than their goalies) and i have always felt shink will be a top 6 forward within 2-3 years. Also with them looking to stay bottom, allows them to start trying Markstrom out and will not effect their overall progress. Same with shink.
- Retinalz

No way they take that package.

Lets play a scenario. Lets assume Virtanen, Horvat and Markstrom/Lack are available. Who would you guys realistically target with that package?

You could also seperate the twins in 5v5. They proved they don't need to play together to produce(Henrik won scoring title with Daniel injure for a large amount of season). Put Daniel on 2nd line and trade for a rwing. Maybe get Eberle? bring up someone from ahl.

jensen(or shink)-hank-vrbata
dank - bonino - eberle
mattias - richardson - burrows
kenins - horvat - dorset

use Vey, hansen and higgins in deal for a good young rwing
- Retinalz

The second line would get their asses kicked by a trio of angry grandmothers

I wouldn't trade hall for horvat straight up. Horvat is gonna be a beauty and with mccann and Virtanen we have 3 young greay players. I am scared in 2 years that we are behind the curve as the Sedin have given us all they have and we aren't ready to replace like they replaced Nas Lund. But horvat and mccann can potentially be Bergeron krejci in the playoffs. I am excited and trader Jim has been killing it for us.

No way they take that package.
- Nucker101

I would do Tanev Markstrom and a first for Hall, sorry I just would

Side note - am I the only one who thinks the Jets logo/jerseys are (frank)ing boring as poop?
- bezz44

They're ugly as (frank). I pray they bring back the original as an alternate.

I would do Tanev Markstrom and a first for Hall, sorry I just would
- VANTEL

EDM wouldn't.

The second line would get their asses kicked by a trio of angry grandmothers
- VANTEL

That's an upgrade from the current line that gets beaten by small children.

That's an upgrade from the current line that gets beaten by small children.
- Retinalz

Both lines would regularly get their asses kicked, but it's definitely an upgrade offensively.

Lets play a scenario. Lets assume Virtanen, Horvat and Markstrom/Lack are available. Who would you guys realistically target with that package?
- Linden_4_Capt

Seguin

No way they take that package.
- Nucker101

Tanev, Lack and Hansen for Eberle and 2nd

Lets play a scenario. Lets assume Virtanen, Horvat and Markstrom/Lack are available. Who would you guys realistically target with that package?
- Linden_4_Capt

Buffalo trades for max domi

reinhart, domi and 3rd

Seguin
- Bieksa#3

A time machine, and then Seguin.

Buffalo trades for max domi

reinhart, domi and 3rd
- Retinalz

So Virtanen and Lack for domi and 3rd

Tanev, Lack and Hansen for Eberle and 2nd
- Bieksa#3

Not bad value, but I don't think it'd help this team much. You'd score more and give up more goals.

I would do Tanev Markstrom and a first for Hall, sorry I just would
- VANTEL

You'd need quite a bit more, me thinks

Not bad value, but I don't think it'd help this team much. You'd score more and give up more goals.
- Nucker101

In 2011 didn't we have the motto of "Outscore the other team. If they get 1 we get 2"?

In 2011 didn't we have the motto of "Outscore the other team. If they get 1 we get 2"?
- Retinalz

Those Canuck teams were good offensively and defensively. If you only want a good forward group you'll end up like DAL/COL/PHI

Those Canuck teams were good offensively and defensively. If you only want a good forward group you'll end up like DAL/COL/PHI
- Nucker101

and even then, it's not like Colorado is banging pucks in left and right. Just means that you can have the talent but if you don't have a couple of high-minute high-end puck moving defenseman, you are pretty much hooped . If your top end forwards don't get that distribution then it doesn't matter how good of an offense you have

In 2011 didn't we have the motto of "Outscore the other team. If they get 1 we get 2"?
- Retinalz

Thems were the days, indeed

Scrivens is not as bad as he's looked. He's a bit streaky but when he's on he's quite good. It's just he's got a sh*tty defense in front of him who give up a whole slew of chances night in and night out. I don't think Markstrom would be an upgrade, at this time at least.
- Zogg

It's the EDM effect. Look at Dubnyk this year

It's the EDM effect. Look at Dubnyk this year
- bezz44

lol good point - Dubynk is somehow channeling Patric Roy for gawd sakes (of course I had him in a pool last #@%#@$ year )

Is it still Tuesday?
I need a jazzy.

Lets play a scenario. Lets assume Virtanen, Horvat and Markstrom/Lack are available. Who would you guys realistically target with that package?
- Linden_4_Capt

Seems like it's not quite enough of a package to get a top player but a bit too much if you are looking at someone a tier lower. I think Bieksa mentioned Seguin - although I don't think Dallas does that deal but it would be close