Well, the puck is black and the ice is white, so....
- hscesq

Can’t forget the blue line. Technically, black white and blue.

Can’t forget the blue line. Technically, black white and blue as day.
- Mahewman

If it was clear as day they wouldn’t need to zoom in and go frame by frame to catch the one frame that shows his skate enter the zone a millionth of a second before the puck. It took them several minutes to review. Not really black and white at all.
- Mahewman

this is exactly what we would figuratively refer to as black and white. like exactly.

Excellent take here. I agree completely. Only one thing - it's "offside". There's no "s" at the end. It's a pet peeve of mine, sorry.
- hscesq

really? you agree with "reviewed at full speed"?

this is exactly what we would figuratively refer to as black and white. like exactly.
- DoubleDown

You watch your mouth.

really? you agree with "reviewed at full speed"?
- DoubleDown

I was told that there would be no math.

I was told that there would be no math.
- hscesq

why new just review in fast-forward?

why new just review in fast-forward?
- DoubleDown

I'm sorry, but I have no idea what this means.

why 30 seconds?

why not 10 seconds? 60 seconds? 31 seconds? 1042 seconds?
- Coburns_Nose

I feel if you can’t tell in 30 seconds, it’s way too close to make a difference on the play. Why the attitude?

I'm sorry, but I have no idea what this means.
- hscesq

new=not

new=not
- Symba007

Ok. So...I cannew understand what it means?

Ok. So...I cannew understand what it means?
- hscesq

Offside(s)

he was offsides, thats not why they lost.
Tuukka was not good last night, thats why they lost.

this isnt the first time this has happened to the Bruins this year, they need to be more aware.

sorry double post

The puck was in his skates, he did not have control and was offside.

Get ready.. Bruins and Habs will meet in the playoffs, Bruins will be big favorites, Habs will win the series.
- itsallfalse

Habs barely won on full rest with the B's going toe to toe with the Pens the night before, not too worried.

He doesnt reach back at all. The puck is passed right to the back of the skate. He has no idea where it is and stops and looks down. There was no reaching back or kicking the puck up, it simply just hit his skate nothing more
- xShoot4WarAmpsx

Did you watch the video by Peter Adrianopolous or just look at the picture before that. If you watch the video you can see Coyle look over, move his skate back to catch and kick the puck up. He had control.

I like what the NFL has done with Pass Interference challenges

It has to be "egregious" to change the on field call. "Close" or "Some Interference" doesn't get it done

I want a 6 inch -1 foot minimum for a missed call to be overturned. That'll be rid of these millimetre challenges

I like what the NFL has done with Pass Interference challenges

It has to be "egregious" to change the on field call. "Close" or "Some Interference" doesn't get it done

I want a 6 inch -1 foot minimum for a missed call to be overturned. That'll be rid of these millimetre challenges
- TheGame316

Its letting the refs off the hook for not doing their jobs, now they dont need to make an offside call cause it will go to review. Maybe give the bench 20-30 seconds to decide if they want to have it reviewed while play is still going on, then at a break they can check. If play breaks other way, no worries.

I feel if you can’t tell in 30 seconds, it’s way too close to make a difference on the play. Why the attitude?
- Tannerisanidiot

why 30 seconds?

why not 10 seconds? 60 seconds? 31 seconds? 1042 seconds?
- Coburns_Nose

yes we understand what you're saying. We're wondering why you chose 30 seconds.

yes we understand what you're saying. We're wondering why you chose 30 seconds.
- Coburns_Nose

Well I answered that question.......
Granted 30 might not be enough time but the point im getting at still stands.