|
|
Are you saying the team is a bunch of pansies? - Reubenkincade
Since 2010 and counting. You think everyone would be use to it by now |
|
|
|
Since 2010 and counting. You think everyone would be use to it by now - VANTEL
It is something I can never get used to. |
|
|
|
It is something I can never get used to. - Reubenkincade
Canucks should hire some of the HB tough guys |
|
|
|
Since 2010 and counting. You think everyone would be use to it by now - VANTEL
McKeown and Ferland might help but one is not quite ready and the other can't shake his head. |
|
|
|
McKeown and Ferland might help but one is not quite ready and the other can't shake his head. - Bettmanhatesus
Podkolzon looks to have some fire to. |
|
Makita
Referee Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: #theonlyrealfan, BC Joined: 02.16.2007
|
|
|
It's pretty simple, they are pillow biters who should really be watching the Hallmark channel. - Marwood
My wife watches the Hallmark channel and she thinks the majority of the team are pussies who can’t even deliver a hit let alone consider pushback.
Moral to the post, don’t generalize all Hallmark watchers... |
|
|
|
Canucks should hire some of the HB tough guys - VANTEL
Booner's elbows are probably pretty sharp. |
|
|
|
Podkolzon looks to have some fire to. - Bettmanhatesus
He is not a fighter. |
|
|
|
YeOldTimer
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
Since 2010 and counting. You think everyone would be use to it by now - VANTEL
That for me is the primary appeal of Tryamkin. At heart he's just as soft as everyone else but he can and will hurt people even when he doesn't mean to. And, if he ever does lose his temper, oh oh.
Swapping out Fantenberg or Stetcher for him probably doesn't hurt you much defensively but I think he definitely would make the Canucks less fun to play against.
|
|
|
|
|
|
That for me is the primary appeal of Tryamkin. At heart he's just as soft as everyone else but he can and will hurt people even when he doesn't mean to. And, if he ever does lose his temper, oh oh.
Swapping out Fantenberg or Stetcher for him probably doesn't hurt you much defensively but I think he definitely would make the Canucks less fun to play against. - YeOldTimer
I agree |
|
CubanBuffet
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Whine Country Joined: 08.29.2014
|
|
|
He is not a fighter. - VANTEL
I’d like a team that recognizes when the refs have put the whistles away, and capitalizes on that. Get the extra shot in after the whistle, bump the goalie, hit a little late. Push the envelope. It’s not about fighting, it’s about grinding the other team down.
The Canucks keep talking about playing within the rules. Well, if the refs don’t call it, it’s within the rules. Let the other team expend their energy complaining to the refs about a missed call. Laugh in their faces when they start to get frustrated. And when they take a stupid retaliation penalty, that’s when you make them pay on the power play. |
|
|
|
I’d like a team that recognizes when the refs have put the whistles away, and capitalizes on that. Get the extra shot in after the whistle, bump the goalie, hit a little late. Push the envelope. It’s not about fighting, it’s about grinding the other team down.
The Canucks keep talking about playing within the rules. Well, if the refs don’t call it, it’s within the rules. Let the other team expend their energy complaining to the refs about a missed call. Laugh in their faces when they start to get frustrated. And when they take a stupid retaliation penalty, that’s when you make them pay on the power play. - CubanBuffet
You are either a team that punishes or gets punished. Most people on here don't want that type of player on the team until they get punished and then we get weeks of complaining on here |
|
|
|
You are either a team that punishes or gets punished. Most people on here don't want that type of player on the team until they get punished and then we get weeks of complaining on here - VANTEL
I don't, I would like 3, one on defense and 2 forwards, but, they have to be able to play as well.😊 |
|
CubanBuffet
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Whine Country Joined: 08.29.2014
|
|
|
You are either a team that punishes or gets punished. Most people on here don't want that type of player on the team until they get punished and then we get weeks of complaining on here - VANTEL
We want a team that plays within the rules.
Until a Canuck takes a cheap shot. Then we want a team that dismembers a (frank)er. |
|
|
|
I don't, I would like 3, one on defense and 2 forwards, but, they have to be able to play as well.😊 - Reubenkincade
People on here hate Beagle and he has probably had more fights and stuck up for more team mates than any other player on the Canucks. |
|
|
|
It is something I can never get used to. - Reubenkincade
I have always said they need a junkyard dog. Is it Zac Mac? Don't know but someone players don't want to fuk with. Not BFG.
|
|
|
|
People on here hate Beagle and he has probably had more fights and stuck up for more team mates than any other player on the Canucks. - VANTEL
I like him, I hate no one else steps up.
|
|
|
|
I have always said they need a junkyard dog. Is it Zac Mac? Don't know but someone players don't want to fuk with. Not BFG. - VanHockeyGuy
Agreed.
Thet need to gi e Zacmac a few more games, see how he handles the role. |
|
|
|
Agreed.
Thet need to gi e Zacmac a few more games, see how he handles the role. - Reubenkincade
Perfect age, not sure he's the guy but he has the nasty edge.
|
|
|
|
Perfect age, not sure he's the guy but he has the nasty edge. - VanHockeyGuy
Rather they play him over Schaller or LE. |
|
|
|
People on here hate Beagle and he has probably had more fights and stuck up for more team mates than any other player on the Canucks. - VANTEL
I have no issues with Beagle, he plays his role well. |
|
|
|
It seems the softness epidemic is all over the league, even the Florida blogger is complaining about the softness of that team.
It's not just a problem with Canucks, but Leafs and Panthers are just as bad.
Welcome to the new nhl. Lol |
|
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken |
|
|
Location: BC Joined: 11.11.2010
|
|
|
They were talking about him on Sportsnet, they basically said he has little value. - VanHockeyGuy
|
|