Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Carol Schram: Quinn Hughes featured in NHL Brothers show & Podkolzin is giving back
Author Message
Retinalz
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 01.31.2015

Apr 8 @ 12:55 PM ET
Ep is in the Lark/Aho/Barzal class - he will get somewhere between 9-10 depending on term and what the cap is at signing. I also think Hughes will get around 8-9 depending on how he does next season.
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Apr 8 @ 12:56 PM ET
I don't think he is saying that at all.
- VANTEL

He’s making a strange case about resigning him. I said that cuz i 100% disagree with him.
Makita
Referee
Vancouver Canucks
Location: #theonlyrealfan, BC
Joined: 02.16.2007

Apr 8 @ 12:56 PM ET
I don't think he is saying that at all.
- VANTEL

fewer words
NuckUp
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Cap Busters
Joined: 07.01.2019

Apr 8 @ 12:58 PM ET
If the cap goes up $5 m it will also be easier.
- 1970vintage


Okay so you're using hyberbole to make the point things will be difficult and teams will suffer. Though, when the league starts up again, its not a situation of lets get teams in line from over spending on players like a lock out situation. It will be about how to generate revenue with an exciting product on ice. Entice people to buy in the challenge of world wide recovery.

So wherever the cap ends up going down there will likely be measures to help teams keep players they want and shed players they don't to make the product on ice better. Compliance buyouts are one tool. That's a logical deduction and not a surety of course.

I wouldn't even be surprised if the teams like the Canucks get the NHL to remove the cap recapture penalty. As those type of contracts are no longer possible there is no harm to the league but present harm to teams trying to recover. The case can be made that penalty hampers the new goals of the league in the wake of the pandemic shutdown and its economic repercussions.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Apr 8 @ 12:58 PM ET
Because other than goal-scoring (which I admit AM has him beat) EP is showing signs that he's better in every way. Better at playmaking, faceoffs, two-way center and doesn't get drunk and get caught with a DUI
- DariusKnight



If Jim is looking at giving Petey over 10 mil then he is nuts . I would look at bridge deal in the 7 range
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Apr 8 @ 12:58 PM ET
Ep is in the Lark/Aho/Barzal class - he will get somewhere between 9-10 depending on term and what the cap is at signing. I also think Hughes will get around 8-9 depending on how he does next season.
- Retinalz

Sounds about right to me
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Not Quesnel, BC
Joined: 10.11.2005

Apr 8 @ 1:02 PM ET
Because other than goal-scoring (which I admit AM has him beat) EP is showing signs that he's better in every way. Better at playmaking, faceoffs, two-way center and doesn't get drunk and get caught with a DUI
- DariusKnight


Top goal scorers get paid more than play makers and two way players. EP is not good at face offs regardless of being a bit better than AM so that is not going to earn him millions. Think about it... Miller is taking almost all his face offs... so why would EP earn big money on face offs? Also, giving a player more money because you doubt he'd get in trouble with the police doesnt really seem in the mix of negotiation points.

EP will get paid big, no doubt.
LeftCoaster
Location: Valley Of The Sun
Joined: 07.03.2009

Apr 8 @ 1:03 PM ET
So you don’t like Toffoli we get it.
- Nighthawk

Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Apr 8 @ 1:03 PM ET
If Jim is looking at giving Petey over 10 mil then he is nuts . I would look at bridge deal in the 7 range
- VANTEL

Bridge deals for Petey & Hughes are real possibilities. Cap situation will be the decider for either or both of them. Brock got a middlin deal on $ & term.
LeftCoaster
Location: Valley Of The Sun
Joined: 07.03.2009

Apr 8 @ 1:04 PM ET
Top goal scorers get paid more than play makers and two way players. EP is not good at face offs regardless of being a bit better than AM so that is not going to earn him millions. Think about it... Miller is taking almost all his face offs... so why would EP earn big money on face offs? Also, giving a player more money because you doubt he'd get in trouble with the police doesnt really seem in the mix of negotiation points.

EP will get paid big, no doubt.

- boonerbuck

He doesn’t even take faceoffs, Miller does 99% of the time.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Apr 8 @ 1:05 PM ET
Bridge deals for Petey & Hughes are real possibilities. Cap situation will be the decider for either or both of them. Brock got a middlin deal on $ & term.
- Nighthawk



Next year has a real possibility of being played to empty buildings . The needle on the cap might barely move next year .
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Not Quesnel, BC
Joined: 10.11.2005

Apr 8 @ 1:07 PM ET
He doesn’t even take faceoffs, Miller does 99% of the time.
- LeftCoaster


Its in the quote.
LeftCoaster
Location: Valley Of The Sun
Joined: 07.03.2009

Apr 8 @ 1:09 PM ET
Its in the quote.

- boonerbuck

Yes...I was just reinforcing your point to him, but I quoted you
Marwood
Location: Cumberland, BC
Joined: 03.18.2010

Apr 8 @ 1:11 PM ET
Third Avs player tests positive
- VANTEL

Playoffs!!
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Apr 8 @ 1:12 PM ET
Playoffs!!
- Marwood

Marwood
Location: Cumberland, BC
Joined: 03.18.2010

Apr 8 @ 1:13 PM ET
Okay so you're using hyberbole to make the point things will be difficult and teams will suffer. Though, when the league starts up again, its not a situation of lets get teams in line from over spending on players like a lock out situation. It will be about how to generate revenue with an exciting product on ice. Entice people to buy in the challenge of world wide recovery.

So wherever the cap ends up going down there will likely be measures to help teams keep players they want and shed players that don't to make the product on ice better. Compliance buyouts are one tool. That's a logical deduction and not a surety of course.

I wouldn't even be surprised if the teams like the Canucks get the NHL to remove the cap recapture penalty. As those type of contracts are no longer possible there is no harm to the league but present harm to teams trying to recover. The case can be made that penalty hampers the new goals of the league in the wake of the pandemic shutdown and its economic repercussions.

- NuckUp

What a load of garbage. Flaming dumpster.
Retinalz
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 01.31.2015

Apr 8 @ 1:15 PM ET
He doesn’t even take faceoffs, Miller does 99% of the time.
- LeftCoaster

EP is basically a winger
DariusKnight
Vancouver Canucks
Location: "The Alien has landed in Vancouver!"
Joined: 03.09.2006

Apr 8 @ 1:16 PM ET
Top goal scorers get paid more than play makers and two way players. EP is not good at face offs regardless of being a bit better than AM so that is not going to earn him millions. Think about it... Miller is taking almost all his face offs... so why would EP earn big money on face offs? Also, giving a player more money because you doubt he'd get in trouble with the police doesnt really seem in the mix of negotiation points.

EP will get paid big, no doubt.

- boonerbuck


I think you're missing the point, he's going to be paid for what he is likely going to achieve, which has him on a path that will be far better than AM even though I agree with you that AM /right now/ is the better player and likely better goal scorer over his career. Which is why I say he will likely get AM money even though /right now/ he is not in AM's class. This is the way the NHL has worked /up until now/. COVID-19 might push it down somewhat, but he's still going to be one of the highest paid forwards in the NHL when he eventually signs his next contract.
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Apr 8 @ 1:17 PM ET
EP is basically a winger
- Retinalz

How so?
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Apr 8 @ 1:21 PM ET
I think you're missing the point, he's going to be paid for what he is likely going to achieve, which has him on a path that will be far better than AM even though I agree with you that AM /right now/ is the better player and likely better goal scorer over his career. Which is why I say he will likely get AM money even though /right now/ he is not in AM's class. This is the way the NHL has worked /up until now/. COVID-19 might push it down somewhat, but he's still going to be one of the highest paid forwards in the NHL when he eventually signs his next contract.
- DariusKnight

I think a hefty bridge deal is more likely.
Say 3/8m. Now if he goes out & gets 90+ pts that could mean 8/10m.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Apr 8 @ 1:23 PM ET
I think you're missing the point, he's going to be paid for what he is likely going to achieve, which has him on a path that will be far better than AM even though I agree with you that AM /right now/ is the better player and likely better goal scorer over his career. Which is why I say he will likely get AM money even though /right now/ he is not in AM's class. This is the way the NHL has worked /up until now/. COVID-19 might push it down somewhat, but he's still going to be one of the highest paid forwards in the NHL when he eventually signs his next contract.
- DariusKnight



Not to be the downer of the party but I don't see how GMs come out offering 2017-18 salaries.

The NHL is going to take an ass kicking in lost revenues. If Governments are saying this could take 18-24 months how do you get people into the stadiums .

I have no idea what the cap will look like in two years but I would put money on that the huge contract days might be a thing of the past.
Marwood
Location: Cumberland, BC
Joined: 03.18.2010

Apr 8 @ 1:25 PM ET
Not to be the downer of the party but I don't see how GMs come out offering 2017-18 salaries.

The NHL is going to take an ass kicking in lost revenues. If Governments are saying this could take 18-24 months how do you get people into the stadiums .

I have no idea what the cap will look like in two years but I would put money on that the huge contract days might be a thing of the past.

- VANTEL

Agreed.
Retinalz
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 01.31.2015

Apr 8 @ 1:25 PM ET
How so?
- Nighthawk

Sorry I forgot the it was in reaction to JTM take almost all the face-offs for that line.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Apr 8 @ 1:26 PM ET

Thomas Drance
@ThomasDrance
· 8m
#Canucks winger Tanner Pearson is asked about how much contact he's had with Tyler Toffoli, and sort of stick handles his teammates pending unrestricted free agency.

"I don't want to speak for him, but I think he liked his time here."
Retinalz
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 01.31.2015

Apr 8 @ 1:26 PM ET
Not to be the downer of the party but I don't see how GMs come out offering 2017-18 salaries.

The NHL is going to take an ass kicking in lost revenues. If Governments are saying this could take 18-24 months how do you get people into the stadiums .

I have no idea what the cap will look like in two years but I would put money on that the huge contract days might be a thing of the past.

- VANTEL

Hence compliance buy-outs. and they may need to get creative with massive deals like McDavids.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17  Next