Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
It is a comment that if I answer will go on for 15 pages.
I am not a big Tanev fan. I do trust his D though. I just think it is an over payment - VANTEL
wow, okay then
I know you like physical defensive dmen but I would not trust Schenn against top lines lol.
I'm okay with letting Tanev walk if he wants long-term. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
I read a good article from Drance regarding the Canucks reaction to Toffoli not accepting their deal. Hopefully they feel the same about Marky. - belcherbd
Benning doesn't have the money to give out otherwise he would. See a cap crunch is good, he can't overpay. |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
We'll see but I think Tanev is the most likely to sign a team friendly deal. - belcherbd
Tanev and Stecher seem like the guys who want to be here the most, for whatever that's worth. I'd say Marky is 3rd on that list, then Toffoli. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
wow, okay then
I know you like physical defensive dmen but I would not trust Schenn against top lines lol.
I'm okay with letting Tanev walk if he wants long-term. - Nucker101
Van doesn't have Hedman or McDonaugh. |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
Benning doesn't have the money to give out otherwise he would. See a cap crunch is good, he can't overpay. - manvanfan
I think his current situation has been a wake up call for him, in the past when he had bad contracts, it didn't hurt him too much because the cap kept going up and the team didn't have expectations. Now it's a flat cap and there's real pressure for the team to make the playoffs every year and not get their asses kicked in round one, he (hopefully) realizes how crippling those overpayments to role players can be. |
|
|
|
We'll see but I think Tanev is the most likely to sign a team friendly deal. - belcherbd
If he does that is fine.
He reminds me of a guy that will keep your team comfortable. He wont bring scoring or toughness but he will provide good position.
I would rather have a tough guy on the bottom pairing and a aggressive Dman in the top part. |
|
|
|
I would rather Schenn instead of Tanev
- VANTEL
I’d rather Schenn than Stecher, or Tanev at 2-3X $AAV. Thought he was a good pairing with QH. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Would rather Schenn than Stetcher for the money they'll be offering. - NewYorkNuck
This |
|
|
|
I’d rather Schenn than Stecher, or Tanev at 2-3X $AAV. Thought he was a good pairing with QH. - SlightlyOffside
I think QH will make most anyone look good.
|
|
NorthNuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Yellowknife, NWT Joined: 05.30.2016
|
|
|
2X5.3 for Domi. Seems like he's saying I respect that you traded for me but as soon as I'm 27 I want my choice of where I play. |
|
|
|
If he does that is fine.
He reminds me of a guy that will keep your team comfortable. He wont bring scoring or toughness but he will provide good position.
I would rather have a tough guy on the bottom pairing and a aggressive Dman in the top part. - VANTEL
comfortable is a good word for him. i do fear that hes a crutch that will be overused as he slows down though and that maybe the team wouldnt pursue certain players because they believe hes still the same capability he once was |
|
belcherbd
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Nanaimo Joined: 02.16.2007
|
|
|
If he does that is fine.
He reminds me of a guy that will keep your team comfortable. He wont bring scoring or toughness but he will provide good position.
I would rather have a tough guy on the bottom pairing and a aggressive Dman in the top part. - VANTEL
Problem is we need a safe guy to play with our aggressive guy on the top line. Hughes was fantastic this year but still has a long way to go to become a true #1. Tanev was a key to his success this year.
I also want some punishing players but I prefer them fore checking than playing chasing guys around the net. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Most of the silly Canuck rumors come from the local guys. If they saw something written on a bathroom wall, it would be on the air immediately as a source. - boonerbuck
I wouldn’t know. I don’t use the ladies room. |
|
|
|
LOL, imagine not qualifying a player at his age and he is right shot.
Common sense isn’t common |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
I wouldn’t know. I don’t use the ladies room. - Nighthawk
It's good to take a piss on your neighbour's lawn once in awhile, a sign of dominance. |
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
Only Bloated has tried that. He then realized he is a 160 pound government worker and got 2nd degree burns from a cinnamon latte - CanuckDon
|
|
Retinalz
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 01.31.2015
|
|
|
LOL, imagine not qualifying a player at his age and he is right shot.
Common sense isn’t common - classic321
Stetcher isn't worth his QO, even if we had more cap he wouldn't be worth a QO. |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
LOL, imagine not qualifying a player at his age and he is right shot.
Common sense isn’t common - classic321
I think they're afraid of his arbitration number and not being allowed to walk way from it. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
I think his current situation has been a wake up call for him, in the past when he had bad contracts, it didn't hurt him too much because the cap kept going up and the team didn't have expectations. Now it's a flat cap and there's real pressure for the team to make the playoffs every year and not get their asses kicked in round one, he (hopefully) realizes how crippling those overpayments to role players can be. - Nucker101
Those overpayments until last year were to get players to come to Van also though. They weren't good remember.
Just look now, players want to come to Van. JB just going to have to make some tougher decisions which he already didn't by not getting into the 2nd round. |
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
I wouldn’t know. I don’t use the ladies room. - Nighthawk
Ok but you still sit to pee.
|
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
LOL, imagine not qualifying a player at his age and he is right shot.
Common sense isn’t common - classic321
He is worth half of his qualifying offer. I’d be pissed if they brought him back. Small, weak, muffin shot and average mobility. I don’t give a (frank) if he is from Richmond or Nigeria |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Ok but you still sit to pee.
- boonerbuck
Only when on HB reading Pressy’s crap lol |
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
It's good to take a piss on your neighbour's lawn once in awhile, a sign of dominance. - Nucker101
I do more of a Jim Carey. I poop on the neighbors lawn. |
|
|
|
I think his current situation has been a wake up call for him, in the past when he had bad contracts, it didn't hurt him too much because the cap kept going up and the team didn't have expectations. Now it's a flat cap and there's real pressure for the team to make the playoffs every year and not get their asses kicked in round one, he (hopefully) realizes how crippling those overpayments to role players can be. - Nucker101
I know one of the reasons I stand out is because of my opinion. 99% of the people complain against Beagle Roussel and Sutter but aside from me and Makita the coach on the Canucks chose to play those three ahead of Jake Gauds Zack . I think in the Vegas 5-1 loss Beagle was not on for a goal. Those guys kill penalties win draws and stir the pot . If Jake stirred the pot it would be an easy choice. If Gauds won faceoffs and was reliable defensively again another easy choice.
I agree they need to improve the bottom 6 but right now the answer is not JV Zack or Gauds
|
|
|
|
He is worth half of his qualifying offer. I’d be pissed if they brought him back. Small, weak, muffin shot and average mobility. I don’t give a (frank) if he is from Richmond or Nigeria - CanuckDon
Funny most of that describes the $6 million dollar giraffe more than stecher |
|