Amerks lost 5-1 last night
Comrie 4 goals on 28 shots
Weissbach with his 12th goal
Rousek with a assist
- Buff36

Would love to hear from someone who watched the game if those goals he gave up were HD

I agree Krebs deserves to play with more skilled offensive players. He sets up Okposo and Girgs all the time and they can’t finish
- Sabretooth9

Krebs won't diminish on his offensive skill. He's got that part. He needs to become a better defensive forward and more proactive shooter. The former greatly improving.

Mickey Mouse win for Canada
- sbroads24

Guys, you have to let the goalie try to make the save... especially in the crease.. and no Canadian player pushed Blake either

I believe Comrie’s first game with the Amerks he won and was the first star. Don’t know anything about last night…

Would love to hear from someone who watched the game if those goals he gave up were HD
- TheSabresTaco

https://www.amerks.com/
Some good some bad, Amerks play horrible D

Guys, you have to let the goalie move to try to make the save... especially in the crease.. and no Canadian player pushed Blake either
- DirtyDan

If that’s a Canada goal called back people are burning cars In the streets.

If that’s a Canada goal called back people are burning cars In the streets.
- ImThatGuy

That's called back in any league.

You cant have both skates in the crease and one leg holding the goalie back (even if its unintentional)

Guys, you have to let the goalie try to make the save... especially in the crease.. and no Canadian player pushed Blake either
- DirtyDan

yet the tsn crew thought they got it wrong both times

https://www.amerks.com/
Some good some bad, Amerks play horrible D
- Buff36

no defense nhl prospects down there

If that’s a Canada goal called back people are burning cars In the streets.
- ImThatGuy

I turned it off when it was clear that the fix was in

yet the tsn crew thought they got it wrong both times
- homiedclown

and mentioned it multiple times throughout the broadcast for quite a while...

once that got called back and the 4th goal went in the USA just wasnt the same, that call wrong or right was the changing point in that game

I turned it off when it was clear that the fix was in
- homiedclown

there were a few non calls after that too.. i turned it off at the end of the second

yet the tsn crew thought they got it wrong both times
- homiedclown

Whos was that craig button?

I turned it off when it was clear that the fix was in
- homiedclown

You guys had the first PP of the game to go up 3-0... but did not

You guys had the first PP of the game to go up 3-0... but did not
- DirtyDan

bag of Canadian money arrived late

https://www.youtube.com/w...qAnYVYCqAg&ab_channel=TSN

6:21 for the first called back goal "now his foot is in the crease but if you have the puck Gord are you allowed to touch the goalie in the crease?" NOPE

8:30 second called back goal they clearly say it should be challenged and a non-goal.

Not sure what TSN feed ya'll were watching

bag of Canadian money arrived late
- homiedclown

You guys should know you're not allowed a foot in the crease


I wasn't old enough to remember but I know you do

no defense nhl prospects down there
- homiedclown

Nope, needs to be addressed

You guys should know you're not allowed a foot in the crease


I wasn't old enough to remember but I know you do
- DirtyDan

"If an attacking Player initiates 'a relevant contact' with a Goalkeeper, incidental or otherwise, while the Goalkeeper is in their Goal Crease, and a goal is scored, the goal will be disallowed.

If an attacking Player establishes a 'significant position' within the Goal Crease, so as to obstruct the Goalkeeper’s vision and impair their ability to defend their goal, and a goal is scored, the goal will be disallowed. For this purpose, a Player 'establishes a significant position within the crease' when, in the Referee’s judgment, their body, or a substantial portion thereof, is within the Goal Crease for more than an instantaneous period of time."



the key part of this is "For this purpose, a Player 'establishes a significant position within the crease' when, in the Referee’s judgment, their body, or a substantial portion thereof, is within the Goal Crease for more than an instantaneous period of time."

the rule is totally open to interpretation and both times the call on the ice was goal with a ref right there


usa coach was classy
"I would say I’m pretty frustrated, but I’m not going to comment on it," Pecknold said. "I'm not going to comment on officiating, other than you’ve got 18-, 19-year-old kids in this environment. To have two taken away, that’s a huge part of the game for sure. But I'm not going to comment on the officials. The head officials can deal with that."


https://www.sportingnews..../a082hk2uymtmafnewg1vxcsl

"If an attacking Player initiates 'a relevant contact' with a Goalkeeper, incidental or otherwise, while the Goalkeeper is in their Goal Crease, and a goal is scored, the goal will be disallowed.

If an attacking Player establishes a 'significant position' within the Goal Crease, so as to obstruct the Goalkeeper’s vision and impair their ability to defend their goal, and a goal is scored, the goal will be disallowed. For this purpose, a Player 'establishes a significant position within the crease' when, in the Referee’s judgment, their body, or a substantial portion thereof, is within the Goal Crease for more than an instantaneous period of time."



the key part of this is "For this purpose, a Player 'establishes a significant position within the crease' when, in the Referee’s judgment, their body, or a substantial portion thereof, is within the Goal Crease for more than an instantaneous period of time."

the rule is totally open to interpretation and both times the call on the ice was goal with a ref right there


usa coach was classy
"I would say I’m pretty frustrated, but I’m not going to comment on it," Pecknold said. "I'm not going to comment on officiating, other than you’ve got 18-, 19-year-old kids in this environment. To have two taken away, that’s a huge part of the game for sure. But I'm not going to comment on the officials. The head officials can deal with that."


https://www.sportingnews..../a082hk2uymtmafnewg1vxcsl
- homiedclown

"The IIHF rulebook puts an emphasis on players not making contact with goaltenders or being in the crease.

The rules that were applied by the officials to the two disallowed goals fall under Rule 69.3, "Contact Inside the Goal Crease", in the IIHF rulebook. "

Sorry to break it to the 18-19 year olds but rules don't get thrown to the side cause of your age

Kaiir Elam
@kaiirelam5
Our boy is doing better, awake and showing more signs of improvement. Thank you God. Keep the prayers coming please. All love 3!

"The IIHF rulebook puts an emphasis on players not making contact with goaltenders or being in the crease.

The rules that were applied by the officials to the two disallowed goals fall under Rule 69.3, "Contact Inside the Goal Crease", in the IIHF rulebook. "
- DirtyDan

the rules were applied due to funds being received


next time don't make it so obvious

the rules were applied due to funds being received
- homiedclown

Sorry to break it to the 18-19 year olds but rules don't get thrown to the side cause of your age.

Maybe don't have your whole body in the crease when making contact with the goalie... or shoving the puck out from under him... both no-no's in any league i've ever watched or played in

Sorry to break it to the 18-19 year olds but rules don't get thrown to the side cause of your age
- DirtyDan

For this purpose, a Player 'establishes a significant position within the crease' when, in the Referee’s judgment, their body, or a substantial portion thereof, is within the Goal Crease for more than an instantaneous period of time."