Gavrikov it’s fine, but I’d think a first rd pick deal is better served to get a RW. Florida is regretting the Chariot trade. Package a second with Jones instead, which I think was brought up. For any rental D really thats the deal I would make

Gavrikov it’s fine, but I’d think a first rd pick deal is better served to get a RW. Florida is regretting the Chariot trade. Package a second with Jones instead, which I think was brought up. For any rental D really thats the deal I would make
- Slimtj100

he can eat minutes, there were multiple games this season where he went over 27 minutes, and if we are gonna play until June, we are gonna need that

Nothing to save. I explained why I post the analytics. You and Tommy insinuated Gavrikov was good last night. Better than Blais and Lafreniere. I just explained why that is incorrect. The Rangers literally controlled the entire game when he was on the ice. Does that make him bad for rest year? No. The Rest of his career? No. Was he bad last night? Yes.
- tomburton99

I won't insinuate it --- I'll flat out state it: Gavrikov played well last night. The fact that he is on an AHL level team playing against the Rangers doesn't compute on your charts. Your inability to process what you actually witness on the ice is your problem, but hey, enjoy the silly charts.

This is for you TPC.

he can eat minutes, there were multiple games this season where he went over 27 minutes, and if we are gonna play until June, we are gonna need that
- jimbro83

I still think Kulikov would be the same type of guy. While not costing a first rder.

Anyone they get will probably be elated to get out of selling situation and getting revitalized

I keep seeing Boeser rumors

Nothing to save. I explained why I post the analytics. You and Tommy insinuated Gavrikov was good last night. Better than Blais and Lafreniere. I just explained why that is incorrect. The Rangers literally controlled the entire game when he was on the ice. Does that make him bad for rest year? No. The Rest of his career? No. Was he bad last night? Yes.
- tomburton99

So here is where you lose me. You say "he" was bad last night. So if his D partner or the other 3 players are dogging it all game, how can you put that on an individual with a chart? This is where I believe the eye test is better if you are watching an individual player. He could have been busting his ass all night and played well while his partner was out to lunch or the three forwards weren't helping out. I have no dog in this fight, could care less about Gavrikov.

I won't insinuate it --- I'll flat out state it: Gavrikov played well last night. The fact that he is on an AHL level team playing against the Rangers doesn't compute on your charts. Your inability to process what you actually witness on the ice is your problem, but hey, enjoy the silly charts.
- TommyGTrain

He didn't. Please scroll back

Shot attempts when he was on ice: 8 for CBJ. 11 for NYR

Scoring Chances: 0 for CBJ. 7 for NYR.

Goals: For, 0. Against, 1.

I still think Kulikov would be the same type of guy. While not costing a first rder.

Anyone they get will probably be elated to get out of selling situation and getting revitalized

I keep seeing Boeser rumors
- Slimtj100

I remember last year when they pulled the Vatrano trade out of absolutely nowhere, wasnt even the faintest of rumors

I dont see the Boeser thing happening, he's got big money for two more years

This is for you TPC.
- tomburton99

I never understood how people complained about his extension being too much AAV

So here is where you lose me. You say "he" was bad last night. So if his D partner or the other 3 players are dogging it all game, how can you put that on an individual with a chart? This is where I believe the eye test is better if you are watching an individual player. He could have been busting his ass all night and played well while his partner was out to lunch or the three forwards weren't helping out. I have no dog in this fight, could care less about Gavrikov.
- mdw7413

Last night at 5 on 5 he spent the majority of his time with Boqvist as his D partent. Boqvist also had a bad night but not as bad as Gavrikov.

Team absolutely does have something to do with it.

I never understood how people complained about his extension being too much AAV
- nyrangers2

Because we as Ranger fans love to complain. Myself included. (Not about this.)

Last night at 5 on 5 he spent the majority of his time with Boqvist as his D partent. Boqvist also had a bad night but not as bad as Gavrikov.

Team absolutely does have something to do with it.
- tomburton99

Yeah, I honestly have no idea cause I wasn't paying attention to Gavrikov. Just my opinion, but I think those individual kind of charts are good for a stretch of games where its a bigger sample size. On a night to night basis I would think certain things might get lost.

Yeah, I honestly have no idea cause I wasn't paying attention to Gavrikov. Just my opinion, but I think those individual kind of charts are good for a stretch of games where its a bigger sample size. On a night to night basis I would think certain things might get lost.
- mdw7413

And I agree. Like his previous 3 games according to the micro stats, he played really well. His cumulative game score on the year is -0.38. That's bad. But you have to account for that team being terrible and injured. He's playing more minutes than he probably should. Get him on better and I think he'd be better.

But in a vacuum (Last night) he was not good. Not a slight. Just the reality.

And I agree. Like his previous 3 games according to the micro stats, he played really well. His cumulative game score on the year is -0.38. That's bad. But you have to account for that team being terrible and injured. He's playing more minutes than he probably should. Get him on better and I think he'd be better.

But in a vacuum (Last night) he was not good. Not a slight. Just the reality.
- tomburton99

Just curious, cause I have no idea where you get that stuff, but what do K'Andre's stats look like? Like the one you posted above of Kreider.

Just curious, cause I have no idea where you get that stuff, but what do K'Andre's stats look like? Like the one you posted above of Kreider.
- mdw7413

Good. This was before he started putting up offesne recently. When his card updates, it will be even better.



Hasn't had a bad game since New Year's day in Florida.

Good. This was before he started putting up offesne recently. When his card updates, it will be even better.



Hasn't had a bad game since New Year's day in Florida.
- tomburton99

Wow. Actually thought it might be a little lower on D. I mean hes probably my favorite player now, so im a little biased. The offense makes sense, he been more productive lately.

Good. This was before he started putting up offesne recently. When his card updates, it will be even better.



Hasn't had a bad game since New Year's day in Florida.
- tomburton99

Still think him and trouba should be split up

Still think him and trouba should be split up
- nyrangers2

I dont agree with that, Harpur-Trouba would be too slow a pairing

Still think him and trouba should be split up
- nyrangers2

They should.

What I'd like to see happen is.

Miller-Fox
Lindgren-Schneider
Robertson-Trouba

Idk if Robertson is one of the injured guys on Hartford on not. But Ben Harpur ain't it. Played well last night though.

I dont agree with that, Harpur-Trouba would be too slow a pairing
- jimbro83

^^^^

want no part of that

They should.

What I'd like to see happen is.

Miller-Fox
Lindgren-Schneider
Robertson-Trouba

Idk if Robertson is one of the injured guys on Hartford on not. But Ben Harpur ain't it. Played well last night though.
- tomburton99

I would keep lindgren/fox and do miller/schneider

I wouldn't have an issue with Trouba away from Miller as long as it is someone very mobile

I would keep lindgren/fox and do miller/schneider

I wouldn't have an issue with Trouba away from Miller as long as it is someone very mobile
- mdw7413

the reality is that Trouba is gonna eat a lot of minutes, and a lot of it is gonna look bad because he's a primary penalty killer

but he gives away the puck a lot and who better than k'Andre to help cover when he (frank)s up

I would keep lindgren/fox and do miller/schneider

I wouldn't have an issue with Trouba away from Miller as long as it is someone very mobile
- mdw7413

Also gotta be a defensive minded d-man. Trouba has become less than ideal in that area as of late.

the reality is that Trouba is gonna eat a lot of minutes, and a lot of it is gonna look bad because he's a primary penalty killer

but he gives away the puck a lot and who better than k'Andre to help cover when he (frank)s up
- jimbro83

Be nice if K' Andre didnt have to worry about it

Be nice if K' Andre didnt have to worry about it
- mdw7413

one more year of Trouba with a NMC