keep up with the false narrative. your statements the other day proved you had an agenda with the whole "mission accomplished." (whick i called out weeks ago, and was obviously correct) i discuss hockey daily. but your petty accusations and your behavior are hypocritical. That was pointed out. keep playing the victim. completely hysterical. now back to rational hockey talk, not just those who want to argue for the sake of arguing. - Peter Richards
There is nothing hypocritical about my posting. The perfect example is today's thread. My posts were strictly related to hockey until jd250 made a personal remark. Same as the other day. In that situation, I will respond in kind and stand up for myself. I finish it. I don't initiate it. If you had the least ounce of objectivity, you would realize that.
When I made my original post to you weeks ago, that I would suspend ignoring you and give you an opportunity for one on one interaction. I stated that we would find out who knows what and who knows squat. That you would be given an opportunity to prove your claims that I don't know what I'm talking about. You failed miserably and it was shown that you don't know squat. You then resorted to your only recourse and returned to trolling. Continued with your post above. I made zero attempt to hide my objective. I told it to you directly, man to man.
Disagreeing and posting opposition opinions is very much part of rational discourse.
There is nothing hypocritical about my posting. The perfect example is today's thread. My posts were strictly related to hockey until jd250 made a personal remark. Same as the other day. In that situation, I will respond in kind and stand up for myself. I finish it. I don't initiate it. If you had the least ounce of objectivity, you would realize that.
When I made my original post to you weeks ago, that I would suspend ignoring you and give you an opportunity for one on one interaction. I stated that we would find out who knows what and who knows squat. That you would be given an opportunity to prove your claims that I don't know what I'm talking about. You failed miserably and it was shown that you don't know squat. You then resorted to your only recourse and returned to trolling. Continued with your post above. I made zero attempt to hide my objective. I told it to you directly, man to man.
Disagreeing and posting opposition opinions is very much part of rational discourse. - MJL
self proclaimed resident expert. You sure you never worked for an NHL team before?
Look up the definition of trolling Cliff. You do it every day.
There is nothing hypocritical about my posting. The perfect example is today's thread. My posts were strictly related to hockey until jd250 made a personal remark. Same as the other day. In that situation, I will respond in kind and stand up for myself. I finish it. I don't initiate it. If you had the least ounce of objectivity, you would realize that.
When I made my original post to you weeks ago, that I would suspend ignoring you and give you an opportunity for one on one interaction. I stated that we would find out who knows what and who knows squat. That you would be given an opportunity to prove your claims that I don't know what I'm talking about. You failed miserably and it was shown that you don't know squat. You then resorted to your only recourse and returned to trolling. Continued with your post above. I made zero attempt to hide my objective. I told it to you directly, man to man.
Disagreeing and posting opposition opinions is very much part of rational discourse. - MJL
never said or made the claim. again you have proved to contradict your own word with your actions. I failed at nothing. keep trying to twist it to fit your narrative. go back to not responding or what you were doing in responding for all i care. told you that weeks ago. just ridiculous and laughable. you have proved nothing. what a joke
never said or made the claim. again you have proved to contradict your own word with your actions. I failed at nothing. keep trying to twist it to fit your narrative. go back to not responding or what you were doing in responding for all i care. told you that weeks ago. just ridiculous and laughable. you have proved nothing. what a joke - Peter Richards
Of course you have. Repeatedly. You stick your hand into the fire and then complain when you get burnt. You have reaped what you sow. I have proven it and will continue to prove it. Good luck to you.
Of course you have. Repeatedly. You stick your hand into the fire and then complain when you get burnt. You have reaped what you sow. I have proven it and will continue to prove it. Good luck to you.
Trolling is your only recourse. - MJL
what are you talking about. maybe i should troll you for a week so you actually know what that would look like. but then you'd be getting the attention you want and i don't have the time....
In order for someone to expose something. They have to reveal something inside that outsiders are not aware of. Everything that you claimed that Tortotrella exposed, was well known outside of the Flyers. Known by and expressed by many fans and posters here on HB for a considerable period of time before Tortorella became a member of the organization. You of course were not one of them. - MJL
Again its really easy for you because everything Sucks in your view when it comes to the Flyers. So anything negative that is exposed, you can simply say "See I told you so". Remember that "rain" analogy you gave me the other day?
what are you talking about. maybe i should troll you for a week so you actually know what that would look like. but then you'd be getting the attention you want and i don't have the time.... - Peter Richards
What I'm talking about is your ignorance. Of how you and others moved the conversation from strictly hockey talk to making it personal. Then blaming me! LOL..You did that.
Then claiming I'm upset. Actually those that had to make it personal, are the guys who are upset. Look at what you're posting. It's sadly pathetic. You clearly have the time.
Again its really easy for you because everything Sucks in your view when it comes to the Flyers. So anything negative that is exposed, you can simply say "See I told you so". Remember that "rain" analogy you gave me the other day? - jd250
Again, you don't think about it before you post. I think Frost, Sanheim, Farabee, Hart, etc suck! Clearly not. Yes, that rain analogy was really good and perfectly described your posting patterns.
When it comes to everything I posted about, yes, I told you so. Long before. I didn't post public rumors that have been well discussed and call it my plan!
