Pat1993
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: disguise delimit, QC Joined: 08.28.2009
|
|
|
no, but that would be the logical thing to do - fidopro
if they feel that Primeau is ready to be a regular at the NHL level, then yes. and then again, he would need to share the load pretty evenly with Montembeault, because having a young goalie like that as a backup wouldn't make a whole lot of sense.
|
|
Pat1993
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: disguise delimit, QC Joined: 08.28.2009
|
|
|
Their defense looks a little suspect too - mr.peanut
you look a little suspect.
you do.
|
|
fidopro
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: Service Temporarily Unavailable, QC Joined: 08.10.2008
|
|
|
if they feel that Primeau is ready to be a regular at the NHL level, then yes. and then again, he would need to share the load pretty evenly with Montembeault, because having a young goalie like that as a backup wouldn't make a whole lot of sense. - Pat1993
absolutely, I don't see Monty playing 70 games.
30-50 seems good to me. enough games for both of them. |
|
Pat1993
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: disguise delimit, QC Joined: 08.28.2009
|
|
|
absolutely, I don't see Monty playing 70 games.
30-50 seems good to me. enough games for both of them. - fidopro
30 games for Primeau is too low, at that point just send him to the Rocket so he can play.
|
|
fidopro
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: Service Temporarily Unavailable, QC Joined: 08.10.2008
|
|
|
30 games for Primeau is too low, at that point just send him to the Rocket so he can play. - Pat1993
he wouldn't play much more than 30 games in Laval. Dobes needs to play too. |
|
Pat1993
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: disguise delimit, QC Joined: 08.28.2009
|
|
|
he wouldn't get play much more than 30 games in Laval. Dobes needs to play too. - fidopro
then they'd probably be closer to a 50/50, unless Primeau has really fallen on the depth chart, which would be surprising considering the habs gave themselves the trouble of keeping 3 goalies for the moment.
|
|
mr.peanut
Vegas Golden Knights |
|
|
Location: Born Wearing Gold 2023-24: 6-0-0, QC Joined: 12.18.2011
|
|
|
you look a little suspect.
you do. - Pat1993
wow
WOW |
|
Pat1993
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: disguise delimit, QC Joined: 08.28.2009
|
|
|
wow
WOW - mr.peanut
yeah, I know a thing or two about being little and sus.
|
|
Mashadar
|
|
|
Location: Let the creamy goaltending season begin! Joined: 08.31.2014
|
|
|
The guy the lightning had last night looked good - mr.peanut
He had 1 bad game so far, really... I think they stick with him til Vasilevskiy is back, but their other guy Tomkins, looks iffy.
|
|
deadpoulet
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Montreal Joined: 07.01.2008
|
|
|
then they'd probably be closer to a 50/50, unless Primeau has really fallen on the depth chart, which would be surprising considering the habs gave themselves the trouble of keeping 3 goalies for the moment. - Pat1993
They know Dobes is 2 or 3 years away from the NHL, at best.
They can keep drafting goalies all they want, they wont be ready right away either.
30 games or so in the NHL for a back up would be fine for me, but that would mean bye bye Allen. Its more about the spot than the return. |
|
Pat1993
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: disguise delimit, QC Joined: 08.28.2009
|
|
|
They know Dobes is 2 or 3 years away from the NHL, at best.
They can keep drafting goalies all they want, they wont be ready right away either.
30 games or so in the NHL for a back up would be fine for me, but that would mean bye bye Allen. Its more about the spot than the return. - deadpoulet
I find putting Primeau in that position at this stage in his career would be a bad move, you rarely see younger guys be a backup because it takes experience to be able to play only once in a while and still give decent performances.
|
|
mr.peanut
Vegas Golden Knights |
|
|
Location: Born Wearing Gold 2023-24: 6-0-0, QC Joined: 12.18.2011
|
|
|
yeah, I know a thing or two about being little and sus. - Pat1993
|
|
mr.peanut
Vegas Golden Knights |
|
|
Location: Born Wearing Gold 2023-24: 6-0-0, QC Joined: 12.18.2011
|
|
|
He had 1 bad game so far, really... I think they stick with him til Vasilevskiy is back, but their other guy Tomkins, looks iffy. - Mashadar
TB looks so bad in their own zone. Getting caved in and giving up lots of slot shots |
|
Pat1993
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: disguise delimit, QC Joined: 08.28.2009
|
|
|
TB looks so bad in their own zone. Getting caved in and giving up lots of slot shots - mr.peanut
|
|
Mashadar
|
|
|
Location: Let the creamy goaltending season begin! Joined: 08.31.2014
|
|
|
TB looks so bad in their own zone. Getting caved in and giving up lots of slot shots - mr.peanut
Yeah, they are trying to implement a new system this year... only a matter of time before they go back to the old one.
|
|
mr.peanut
Vegas Golden Knights |
|
|
Location: Born Wearing Gold 2023-24: 6-0-0, QC Joined: 12.18.2011
|
|
|
- Pat1993
Besides Hedman and Sergachev, they're relying on Bogosian, Raddysh, Pubix hair, de Haan, fleury, cernack....yikes |
|
deadpoulet
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Montreal Joined: 07.01.2008
|
|
|
I wish I could say Im surprised Boston is undefeated so far, but Im not
fuuuuuck them |
|
Mashadar
|
|
|
Location: Let the creamy goaltending season begin! Joined: 08.31.2014
|
|
|
Besides Hedman and Sergachev, they're relying on Bogosian, Raddysh, Pubix hair, de Haan, fleury, cernack....yikes - mr.peanut
The cap eventually comes for everyone, regardless of how you manipulate it... they had had to let a lot of talent go the last 2-3 years.
They are still a good team, especially with Vasilevskiy in net.
|
|
Pat1993
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: disguise delimit, QC Joined: 08.28.2009
|
|
|
Besides Hedman and Sergachev, they're relying on Bogosian, Raddysh, Pubix hair, de Haan, fleury, cernack....yikes - mr.peanut
yeah, but those (frank)ers still have enough key pieces on their roster to be decent, that team surely won't be crashing down the standings just yet. but hey, if they do I'll definitely be a happy camper... |
|
deadpoulet
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Montreal Joined: 07.01.2008
|
|
|
Besides Hedman and Sergachev, they're relying on Bogosian, Raddysh, Pubix hair, de Haan, fleury, cernack....yikes - mr.peanut
the salary cap says hello
they are also used to have the best goalie in the league
but they dont have the same depth they used to have, even 2 years ago when they went to the finals
and Pubix hair? |
|
Pat1993
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: disguise delimit, QC Joined: 08.28.2009
|
|
|
I wish I could say Im surprised Boston is undefeated so far, but Im not
fuuuuuck them - deadpoulet
it's still early, there's lots of time left for the captain Marchand experiment to fail miserably.
*crosses fingers*
|
|
Mashadar
|
|
|
Location: Let the creamy goaltending season begin! Joined: 08.31.2014
|
|
|
I wish I could say Im surprised Boston is undefeated so far, but Im not
fuuuuuck them - deadpoulet
Solid defence, 2 really good goalies.
They are playing better than I expected, still think they are a playoff team... many people wrote them off this year, but that was not going to happen.
|
|
Pat1993
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: disguise delimit, QC Joined: 08.28.2009
|
|
|
the salary cap says hello
they are also used to have the best goalie in the league
but they dont have the same depth they used to have, even 2 years ago when they went to the finals
and Pubix hair? - deadpoulet
it's like a Rubix cube, but with a chance of herpes.
|
|
deadpoulet
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Montreal Joined: 07.01.2008
|
|
|
yeah, but those (frank)ers still have enough key pieces on their roster to be decent, that team surely won't be crashing down the standings just yet. but hey, if they do I'll definitely be a happy camper... - Pat1993
they could miss the playoffs if they dont get their starter back soon enough
this is a good division and thats with Buffalo having a very slow start |
|
deadpoulet
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Montreal Joined: 07.01.2008
|
|
|
it's like a Rubix cube, but with a chance of herpes. - Pat1993
wow
who would play with that?
you dont have to anwser that one |
|