Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Michael DeRosa: Canucks Flex Offensive Muscles In 10-1 Win Over Sharks
Author Message
K-man25
Calgary Flames
Location: K Town
Joined: 09.02.2014

Nov 8 @ 8:08 PM ET
Where’s Rojan? I miss his intellectual comments here.
Bettmanhatesus
Joined: 08.10.2016

Nov 8 @ 8:14 PM ET
I didn't think I needed to since we both watched the game and no one claimed this didnt happen.... I thought. But now I have my doubts you watched it.


Just like I doubt you are going to bother watching the clip... so you don't have to admit you were mistaken

- boonerbuck

My oilers fan buddies are ignoring me, can’t find them anywhere 😆 can’t hide forever.
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Not Quesnel, BC
Joined: 10.11.2005

Nov 8 @ 8:23 PM ET
Of course I watched game & clip but no one but you claimed it did happen. Saw nothing worth a penalty.
- Nighthawk


Why I suggested 10min misconduct was for the collection of things he ran around and did... not for the straight arm on Hughes alone. You are focussed on one thing in particular so no wonder you see no penalty there. My point is he's lost it and needs to sit. He did far more than Drai....

manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks
Location: MB
Joined: 01.21.2012

Nov 8 @ 8:23 PM ET
Linden just admitted if it was up to Benning he would have probably taken a different player than Pettersson.

Linden said he pushed for Brackett to have the final say in 2017 because he didn't like how 2016 went

On 650 today.


Booner did you call in and argue with Linden on this speculation?
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Not Quesnel, BC
Joined: 10.11.2005

Nov 8 @ 8:30 PM ET
On 650 today.


Booner did you call in and argue with Linden on this speculation?

- manvanfan


Linden is admitting he speculated that because of how 2016 went.... " he probably would have" that's exactly how it's posted there.... so speculation is still speculation.

I don't see Linden claiming Benning didn't know who EP was or made a different decision that had to be overridden like the narrative monkeys like to spin. He wanted Hackett to have final say because he didn't like how 2016 went is the claim.



The difference is linden is speculating what would have happened... maybe he's right... you and so many others are telling a story that JB had to be overruled and the evidence is in the draft table video which it is clearly not.
Reubenkincade
Location: BC
Joined: 11.18.2016

Nov 8 @ 8:43 PM ET
"I wasn't happy with the way our process was in 2016, and that was the first year Judd had taken over the reigns -- and I did not like how our meetings went. So in 2017 i really pushed hard to have Judd really step up and really run a robust type meeting -- in that we can really put our thoughts and feelings on the table. I really pushed hard in that management group to have Judd and his guys make the pick. I give Judd ... and give Ronny Delorme a lot credit as well .. they love this guy. Jim wasn't sold ... if Jim had his choice -- he would have probably taken a different player. But I really pushed to have these guys that were banging their fists on the table ... lets have these conversations .. because i really think we didn't do a good job in 2016 and I think it cost us -- well I know it cost us."
Marwood
Location: Cumberland, BC
Joined: 03.18.2010

Nov 8 @ 8:45 PM ET
"I wasn't happy with the way our process was in 2016, and that was the first year Judd had taken over the reigns -- and I did not like how our meetings went. So in 2017 i really pushed hard to have Judd really step up and really run a robust type meeting -- in that we can really put our thoughts and feelings on the table. I really pushed hard in that management group to have Judd and his guys make the pick. I give Judd ... and give Ronny Delorme a lot credit as well .. they love this guy. Jim wasn't sold ... if Jim had his choice -- he would have probably taken a different player. But I really pushed to have these guys that were banging their fists on the table ... lets have these conversations .. because i really think we didn't do a good job in 2016 and I think it cost us -- well I know it cost us."
- Reubenkincade

Conjecture.
Reubenkincade
Location: BC
Joined: 11.18.2016

Nov 8 @ 8:46 PM ET
I know many of you aren't fans of Beauvillier, but you may want to start watching who on the bottom 6 consistently bring the puck over the blue line, while maintaining possession.
Probably a reason why he usually plays more than Garland and Hoglander
Reubenkincade
Location: BC
Joined: 11.18.2016

Nov 8 @ 8:50 PM ET
Conjecture.
- Marwood


It makes Benning look worse than he already was, so I am going with it.
Reubenkincade
Location: BC
Joined: 11.18.2016

Nov 8 @ 8:52 PM ET
Where’s Rojan? I miss his intellectual comments here.
- K-man25


me too.
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Nov 8 @ 8:55 PM ET
I know many of you aren't fans of Beauvillier, but you may want to start watching who on the bottom 6 consistently bring the puck over the blue line, while maintaining possession.
Probably a reason why he usually plays more than Garland and Hoglander

- Reubenkincade

I’m ok with Beau & went as far as resign him 1/2m.
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks
Location: MB
Joined: 01.21.2012

Nov 8 @ 8:55 PM ET
Linden is admitting he speculated that because of how 2016 went.... " he probably would have" that's exactly how it's posted there.... so speculation is still speculation.

I don't see Linden claiming Benning didn't know who EP was or made a different decision that had to be overridden like the narrative monkeys like to spin. He wanted Hackett to have final say because he didn't like how 2016 went is the claim.



The difference is linden is speculating what would have happened... maybe he's right... you and so many others are telling a story that JB had to be overruled and the evidence is in the draft table video which it is clearly not.

- boonerbuck

So you are saying you did call in and tell him he is lying.
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Not Quesnel, BC
Joined: 10.11.2005

Nov 8 @ 8:56 PM ET
"I wasn't happy with the way our process was in 2016, and that was the first year Judd had taken over the reigns -- and I did not like how our meetings went. So in 2017 i really pushed hard to have Judd really step up and really run a robust type meeting -- in that we can really put our thoughts and feelings on the table. I really pushed hard in that management group to have Judd and his guys make the pick. I give Judd ... and give Ronny Delorme a lot credit as well .. they love this guy. Jim wasn't sold ... if Jim had his choice -- he would have probably taken a different player. But I really pushed to have these guys that were banging their fists on the table ... lets have these conversations .. because i really think we didn't do a good job in 2016 and I think it cost us -- well I know it cost us."
- Reubenkincade


You need to know the back story on the debate....

Still, nothing supports ManVan's claim that "JB had to be overruled and didnt know who EP was... and that the proof was in the draft table video". Thats why he fired the shot at me... now the argument has been reshaped to who JB wanted... which isnt what I argued at all.

The fact that as a group they decided on EP tells the opposite story that he had to be overruled. JB has final say and wanted someone else but in the end they agreed on EP collectively. I mean, how the hell does that translate to being overruled? 2016 was a mess so they reestablished how things were to be done.... and executed it as agreed. A collective decision.
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks
Location: MB
Joined: 01.21.2012

Nov 8 @ 8:56 PM ET
I know many of you aren't fans of Beauvillier, but you may want to start watching who on the bottom 6 consistently bring the puck over the blue line, while maintaining possession.
Probably a reason why he usually plays more than Garland and Hoglander

- Reubenkincade

Gezz, I need to stop using my phone to HB.

I'd keep Beau over Garland
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Not Quesnel, BC
Joined: 10.11.2005

Nov 8 @ 9:04 PM ET
So you are saying you did call in and tell him he is lying.
- manvanfan


I just finished saying maybe he was right about who JB would have picked if it were solely up to him... but that is still speculation. Not like he made up a bunch of stuff like you did.

Look, we argued whether your claims about the overruling was speculation or not and if there was proof like you claimed in the draft table video. There's no proof of any of this in the video or linden comments. Read my comments about the collective decision... it makes more sense if you care.

A collective decision is not a overruling. JB is the only one of the bunch that could overrule(aside from owner) and he went with the collective decision.
Reubenkincade
Location: BC
Joined: 11.18.2016

Nov 8 @ 9:09 PM ET
You need to know the back story on the debate....

Still, nothing supports ManVan's claim that "JB had to be overruled and didnt know who EP was... and that the proof was in the draft table video". Thats why he fired the shot at me... now the argument has been reshaped to who JB wanted... which isnt what I argued at all.

The fact that as a group they decided on EP tells the opposite story that he had to be overruled. JB has final say and wanted someone else but in the end they agreed on EP collectively. I mean, how the hell does that translate to being overruled? 2016 was a mess so they reestablished how things were to be done.... and executed it as agreed. A collective decision.

- boonerbuck


I was reading that over on adifferent site, copied and pasted it here, wasn't aware until after I posted it, that you and Mini were discussing it.
A_SteamingLombardi
Location: Systemic failure / Slurptastic
Joined: 10.12.2008

Nov 8 @ 9:12 PM ET
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Not Quesnel, BC
Joined: 10.11.2005

Nov 8 @ 9:13 PM ET
I was reading that over on adifferent site, copied and pasted it here, wasn't aware until after I posted it, that you and Mini were discussing it.
- Reubenkincade



Understood.
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Nov 8 @ 9:22 PM ET
Still going on about who wanted EP?
Wasn’t JB is obvious.
JB is gone fact.
Is JB a fathead? No doubt about it.

We all can ‘COLLECTIVELY’ agree the JB years of stealth tank did it’s job. So well and it fools all into thinking this season could still be a mirage. Lol
Makita
Referee
Vancouver Canucks
Location: #theonlyrealfan, BC
Joined: 02.16.2007

Nov 8 @ 9:26 PM ET
Of all the pending UFA’s he’s the only one I’d resign. Calls out his team, backs it up physically. He had 11 goals last year on a crappy team. If the
Canucks want him it’s going to be a huge cost.

- K-man25

No thanks, dumb, slow and a detriment to a good defensive team like the Canucks. Looks great on a crappy flames team though.
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Not Quesnel, BC
Joined: 10.11.2005

Nov 8 @ 9:28 PM ET
Still going on about who wanted EP?
Wasn’t JB is obvious.
JB is gone fact.
Is JB a fathead? No doubt about it.

We all can ‘COLLECTIVELY’ agree the JB years of stealth tank did it’s job. So well and it fools all into thinking this season could still be a mirage. Lol

- Nighthawk


Who wanted EP is not my argument nor did I bring this up.
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks
Location: MB
Joined: 01.21.2012

Nov 8 @ 9:28 PM ET
I was reading that over on adifferent site, copied and pasted it here, wasn't aware until after I posted it, that you and Mini were discussing it.
- Reubenkincade

Booner believes nothing and no one not even Linden can tell him otherwise. 🤣
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Nov 8 @ 9:28 PM ET
6-3 Sens we gettem on a B2B
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks
Location: MB
Joined: 01.21.2012

Nov 8 @ 9:30 PM ET
6-4 Sens we gettem on a B2B
- Nighthawk

Should be a high scoring affair tomorrow.
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Nov 8 @ 9:34 PM ET
Should be a high scoring affair tomorrow.
- manvanfan

Haven’t played Ottawa very well but see that changing. 4-1 good guys
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51  Next