That is the ultimate point of it all. He won’t demand a bunch of years. 2 max probably and that’s probably pushing it

If it doesn’t work out again, see ya. He can still produce offense. Which we still lack behind all the scuttlebutt of needing a host of other things
- Slimtj100

I think Jimmy brings up a good point of next year is the year to go for it b/c Laf and Igor get those raises. I don't know player wise who the answer is but yeah.

He's not your buddy, guy
- SkjeiStadium

He doesn’t know that word (name)

if you believe Larry Brooks assertion that the Rangers are prioritizing Kane, then you should also believe him when he says they want a 1 year incentive laden deal

if you believe Larry Brooks assertion that the Rangers are prioritizing Kane, then you should also believe him when he says they want a 1 year incentive laden deal
- jimbro83

If Kane is still greedy he won’t be a Ranger. The interest is mutual going on 2 years now. It’s gonna happen. One year 4-5 million with the bonuses in there

I think Jimmy brings up a good point of next year is the year to go for it b/c Laf and Igor get those raises. I don't know player wise who the answer is but yeah.
- evitageN

when it comes to Patrick Kane, this blog is impossible to have a rationale conversation about because it's one of the main topics where everyone here who hates each other just takes their usual side in the ongoing war on here

when it comes to Patrick Kane, this blog is impossible to have a rationale conversation about because it's one of the main topics where everyone here who hates each other just takes their usual side in the ongoing war on here

- jimbro83

I feel like my opinion on this is pretty reasonable

I feel like my opinion on this is pretty reasonable
- picklerick

Way to make it all about you

if you believe Larry Brooks assertion that the Rangers are prioritizing Kane, then you should also believe him when he says they want a 1 year incentive laden deal
- jimbro83

So if they intend to keep Laf and Shesterkin, then those deals will be harder to sign if Kane were to hit said bonuses. Masterclass Chris Drury.

when it comes to Patrick Kane, this blog is impossible to have a rationale conversation about because it's one of the main topics where everyone here who hates each other just takes their usual side in the ongoing war on here

- jimbro83

It’s dumb to not want him but what can we do

when it comes to Patrick Kane, this blog is impossible to have a rationale conversation about because it's one of the main topics where everyone here who hates each other just takes their usual side in the ongoing war on here

- jimbro83

Because he's now: 35, often injured, and stinks.

Way to make it all about you
- NYR11

better than Tom

So if they intend to keep Laf and Shesterkin, then those deals will be harder to sign if Kane were to hit said bonuses. Masterclass Chris Drury.
- blacksheep1

tell me, what could possibly happen where they would lose Lafreniere because of any contract Patrick kane signed

Because he's now: 35, often injured, and stinks.
- blacksheep1

47 pts in 50 games. Give me that some kinda terrible

It’s dumb to not want him but what can we do
- Slimtj100

You two dingus brothers act like it's impossible to have reasonable discourse on here but then you say stuff like this when you find people have a different opinion. What would you like from us here bucko? I disagree, not respectfully anymore because you were a butt about it. If we get him I'll cross my fingers and toes that i'm wrong... is that ok?

tell me, what could possibly happen where they would lose Lafreniere because of any contract Patrick kane signed
- jimbro83

Bonus overages eat into the cap.

Bonus overages eat into the cap.
- blacksheep1

but you've said he stinks several times on here, how would he make the bonuses then

but you've said he stinks several times on here, how would he make the bonuses then
- jimbro83

Haahahaha got eeeeem

47 pts in 50 games. Give me that some kinda terrible
- Slimtj100

Refer to the charts on the previous page please. Will will always look to them on this keyboard. They are our north star, eternal flame, light in the darkness.

this is so dumb nevermind

You two dingus brothers act like it's impossible to have reasonable discourse on here but then you say stuff like this when you find people have a different opinion. What would you like from us here bucko? I disagree, not respectfully anymore because you were a butt about it. If we get him I'll cross my fingers and toes that i'm wrong... is that ok?
- picklerick

Why are we fighting? I’m excited if we get Kane is all

but you've said he stinks several times on here, how would he make the bonuses then
- jimbro83

Because they'd be bonuses he could get attain. 1+1=2.

Why are we fighting? I’m excited if we get Kane is all
- Slimtj100

I think you wanted to man. I said I personally think he's not the answer and now you're calling anyone who shares that opinion dumb. I feel like i'm talking to Golem from LOTR with like the little evil voice that pops out every once in a while.

Because they'd be bonuses he could get attain. 1+1=2.
- blacksheep1

you think easily attained bonuses for Patrick Kane, who is 36, oft injured and stinks would impact Alexis Lafreniere actually remaining a Ranger

you think easily attained bonuses for Patrick Kane, who is 36, oft injured and stinks would impact Alexis Lafreniere actually remaining a Ranger
- jimbro83

Yes.

Edit: Play 50% of the games, score 10 goals. reach 20 points. etc, tell me those are realistic while he might miss some time and will be an anchor 5 on 5.

I think they it could happen. Would be something to see.

I think you wanted to man. I said I personally think he's not the answer and now you're calling anyone who shares that opinion dumb. I feel like i'm talking to Golem from LOTR with like the little evil voice that pops out every once in a while.
- picklerick

Tom is the reason why these conversations always become so annoying

you can blame anyone else

but, I've been saying it since he came back, his goal was always to do this