But he wasn’t productive in COL. He was good on faceoffs and had some shootout success. He’s too slow and isn’t physical. He wasn’t a top six anymore and his skill set isn’t a fit in the bottom six. He’s cooked.
- Minnyhock

You know the Flyers are thin at center right and weren’t great at faceoffs this past season, right? Are we gonna compare Colorado’s roster to Philadelphia’s roster? The Flyers aren’t good enough to just throw away players, especially center.

No, none of that is describing what a rebuild is nor was it offering an opinion on what a rebuild is. Please note. I think you're a moron and there is no grey area there.

On another note, I appreciate the opportunity to make you look stupid and petty. By all means, continue.

Remember when you said you could ignore me? Yea,not so much. I'm in your head.
- MJL

You should be on a jury. 😀

Your honor. I find the defendant not guilty. Please note: I am not offering any opinion about what guilty would be.

Ha ha ha.

Ever thought of donating your brain to posterity?

You should be on a jury. 😀

Your honor. I find the defendant not guilty. Please note: I am not offering any opinion about what guilty would be.

Ha ha ha.

Ever thought of denoting your brain to posterity?
- PT21

It's really said how pathetic you've become. That's how I know I have won. If you weren't such an obnoxious ass, a racist and just a generally awful human being, I might take some pity on you. Since you are those things, I won't. You're not even trying to discuss the relevant subject. You're just making childish, petty posts. Your reputation here is beyond repair. I think it's safe to assume that you are a failure in the outside world also. Which is why you've been so desperate to find some kind of recognition on here as a self proclaimed academic and superior intellect. You can't get that standing in the real world, so you tried it here. I've taken that possibility away from you and you are bitter.

You're right though, a jurist finding a defendant not guilty, would not have to state what being guilty would be.

It's really said how pathetic you've become. That's how I know I have won. If you weren't such an obnoxious ass, a racist and just a generally awful human being, I might take some pity on you. Since you are those things, I won't. You're not even trying to discuss the relevant subject. You're just making childish, petty posts. Your reputation here is beyond repair. I think it's safe to assume that you are a failure in the outside world also.

You're right though, a jurist finding a defendant not guilty, would not have to state what being guilty would be.
- MJL

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Dude.

You cannot have an opinion of the negation of something (not guilty, not Rebuilding) without having an opinion of that something.

You would be defying one of the first principles of logic. I cant believe you fell for this one.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Dude.

You cannot have an opinion of the negation of something (not guilty, not Rebuilding) without having an opinion of that something.

You would be defying one of the first principles of logic. I cant believe you fell for this one.
- PT21

You lack simple common sense. Just because you have an opinion of something, does not mean you are stating that opinion. This is really difficult for you isn't it?

Look at you. Childish immature responses and arguments that have nothing to do with the context. You're falling deeper and deeper and getting more pathetic by the day. I enjoy the entertainment

You lack simple common sense. Just because you have an opinion of something, does not mean you are stating that opinion. This is really difficult for you isn't it?

Look at you. Childish immature responses and arguments that have nothing to do with the context. You're falling deeper and deeper and getting more pathetic by the day. I enjoy the entertainment
- MJL

Lets say someone asks you what day of the week it is. And you say: I know it is not Sunday.

Then, you have already offered an opinion about what day of the week it is. Your opinion is that it is one of the remaining 6 days. You have ruled out 1 day, thus narrowing down the set of possibilities from 7 to 6. That is a pov, a judgment, and as such, an opinion. If you had no opinion, the set of possibilities would have remained unaltered.

I have to confess I admire the deep self-confidence with which you effortlessly shrug off over two milennia of Aristotelian logic.

Lets say someone asks you what day of the week it is. And you say: I know it is not Sunday.

Then, you have already offered an opinion about what day of the week it is. Your opinion is that it is one of the remaining 6 days. You have ruled out 1 day, thus narrowing down the set of possibilities from 7 to 6. That is a pov, a judgment, and as such, an opinion. If you had no opinion, the set of possibilities would have remained unaltered.

I have to confess I admire the deep self-confidence with which you effortlessly shrug off over two milennia of Aristotelian logic.
- PT21

That is not representative of what was said. Nice try though. You can twist it all you want.

Unless you have anything actually relevant to the conversation. Which you certainly don't. We are done here. You can try again and you will of course. I have defeated you. That's your issue and why you keep coming back. You just can't handle it. It eats at you. It's never going to change. I'm smarter than you are.